Move sequences are automatically highlighted and made clickable. If the previous move number appears earlier in the comment, the sequence continues from that move. Otherwise, it's treated as a variation from the main line. This can be error-prone with multiple sequences in one comment, so please use the Preview button to check your work before posting.
To force a sequence to be treated as a main line variation, precede it with a vertical bar
(|). The copy variation button (⧉) includes this bar automatically.
For more complex discussions, you can name a sequence by adding the name in square
brackets at the end, e.g. 15.p9 [a]. Later in the same comment, or in
any following comment, you can branch off that variation by wrapping the name in vertical
bars, like this:|a| 16.o13
The variation name must start with
a letter, contain only letters, numbers, and dashes (-), and is case-sensitive.
Comments use UTF-8 encoding, so you can include emojis 😉, non-English characters, and other Unicode symbols.
You can also use HTML entities like — for an em-dash (—) or → for a right arrow (→).
For safety reasons, most HTML tags are stripped, except:
<b>, <i>, <u> — bold, italic, underline<em>, <strong> — emphasis, strong text<s>, <strike> — <sup>, <sub> — superscript, subscript<blockquote> — indented quotes
<code> — fixed-width font<pre> — multi-line preformatted text
<br> — forces a line break
after 6: -0.270
after 12: -0.199
after 18: 0.641
after 24: 0.907
after 30: 0.859
after 36: 0.994
after 42: 0.999
Maybe white missed
|1.b6 2.swap 3.l12 4.k17 5.n17 6.l10 7.j11 8.m12 9.n13 10.j9 11.o11 12.o7 13.t7 14.r8 15.o9 16.n9 17.s10 18.u7 19.r6 20.q10
And went bonkers as a result.
At move 16, the board was still open enough that the analysis didn't complete in 5 minutes, but during analysis, all the best-looking spots were eliminated. Nevertheless, the neural net had made a heat map of the entire board, and at the 5 minute mark, the hottest remaining spot was chosen, whether it was analyzed or not. Huge swaths of the board had gone cold, but it wasn't done yet. Given more time, it would have probably resigned. But it's not gonna resign if there is still a glimmer of hope. It'll take its best shot at the buzzer.
A human would still pick a reasonable-looking / most-chaos-inducing move, hoping that his opponent makes a silly mistake, or that the analysis was happily wrong.
So what can we learn from this? If TwixtBot makes a totally bonkers move, it might mean that you're winning?