Move sequences are automatically highlighted and made clickable. If the previous move number appears earlier in the comment, the sequence continues from that move. Otherwise, it's treated as a variation from the main line. This can be error-prone with multiple sequences in one comment, so please use the Preview button to check your work before posting.
To force a sequence to be treated as a main line variation, precede it with a vertical bar
(|). The copy variation button (⧉) includes this bar automatically.
For more complex discussions, you can name a sequence by adding the name in square
brackets at the end, e.g. 15.p9 [a]. Later in the same comment, or in
any following comment, you can branch off that variation by wrapping the name in vertical
bars, like this:|a| 16.o13
The variation name must start with
a letter, contain only letters, numbers, and dashes (-), and is case-sensitive.
Comments use UTF-8 encoding, so you can include emojis 😉, non-English characters, and other Unicode symbols.
You can also use HTML entities like — for an em-dash (—) or → for a right arrow (→).
For safety reasons, most HTML tags are stripped, except:
<b>, <i>, <u> — bold, italic, underline<em>, <strong> — emphasis, strong text<s>, <strike> — <sup>, <sub> — superscript, subscript<blockquote> — indented quotes
<code> — fixed-width font<pre> — multi-line preformatted text
<br> — forces a line break
1.d3 2.swap 3.n10 4.l16 5.p15 6.n8 7.l9 8.l7 9.j8 10.j6 11.h7 12.h5 13.f6 14.f4 15.d5 16.d3 17.r9 18.p9
He now played 19.q11 which then allowed me to 20.r5. At that point the game was lost for David.
this attempt then fails:
20.r5 21.t5 22.t6 23.u7 24.u8 25.v9
also this one:
20.s5 21.q7 22.q4 23.n4 24.o3 25.m6 26.m2 27.l4
19.t10 20.r17 21.n16 22.q12 23.s13 24.t13 25.u12 26.r14 27.t14 28.s15
19.t10 20.s4 21.s5 22.t6 23.q6 24.q9 25.p8 26.r11 27.q10 28.p12 29.o11 30.n11 31.m10 32.g18 33.n12 34.n16 with lots of variations, for example
35.r16 36.o14 37.u12 38.s16
19.t10 20.r17 21.n16 22.q12 23.s13 24.t13
then White would probably better play 25.r11 (instead of u12).
Then: 26.r14 27.p12 28.o13 29.n13 30.m14 31.h15 32.i19 33.e18
Still a better chance for White to win.
19.t10 20.s4 21.s5 22.t6 23.q6 24.q9 25.p8 26.r11
then White would probably better play 27.s13 (instead of q10).
Then: 28.s14 29.u14 30.r12 31.s15 32.t13 33.t12 34.r19 35.o17 36.q16 37.q14
Also here White looks better.
19.t10 20.r17 21.n16 22.q12 23.s13 24.t13 25.r11 26.r14 27.p12 28.o13 29.n13 30.m18
This is not a final solution, of course, but it looks promising to the left.
31.l15 32.n20 33.k17 34.j19 35.j20 36.i21 37.l19 38.k22 39.m21 40.m22 41.l23
another variant:
31.l15 32.o19 33.k17 34.j19 35.f18
19.t10 20.s4 21.s5 22.t6 23.q6 24.q9 25.p8 26.r11 27.s13 28.s14 29.u14 and now
30.s18 31.q14 32.p18
Tim's line:
19.t10 20.r17 21.n16 22.q12 23.s13 and now
24.p18 25.m18 26.r14 27.t15 28.s15 29.u17 30.t21