Move sequences are automatically highlighted and made clickable. If the previous move number appears earlier in the comment, the sequence continues from that move. Otherwise, it's treated as a variation from the main line. This can be error-prone with multiple sequences in one comment, so please use the Preview button to check your work before posting.
To force a sequence to be treated as a main line variation, precede it with a vertical bar
(|). The copy variation button (⧉) includes this bar automatically.
For more complex discussions, you can name a sequence by adding the name in square
brackets at the end, e.g. 15.p9 [a]. Later in the same comment, or in
any following comment, you can branch off that variation by wrapping the name in vertical
bars, like this:|a| 16.o13
The variation name must start with
a letter, contain only letters, numbers, and dashes (-), and is case-sensitive.
Comments use UTF-8 encoding, so you can include emojis 😉, non-English characters, and other Unicode symbols.
You can also use HTML entities like — for an em-dash (—) or → for a right arrow (→).
For safety reasons, most HTML tags are stripped, except:
<b>, <i>, <u> — bold, italic, underline<em>, <strong> — emphasis, strong text<s>, <strike> — <sup>, <sub> — superscript, subscript<blockquote> — indented quotes
<code> — fixed-width font<pre> — multi-line preformatted text
<br> — forces a line break
Now, typically I don't attack the center of the Y; I go into the branches. But this time I still wasn't seeing any winning branch move. 15.r12? then 16.q7 17.o7 18.k12 19.r16 20.o8, for example. I decided my connection to my gauntlet on the left was valuable enough to use as a threat. So 15.n12. Then if 16.k12 17.m14, if 16.p8 17.n8, and if 16.p9 17.n8.
But when I saw the 16.p9 response, I realized that I totally missed the 17.n8 18.l11 threat. Now, maybe 19.r12 could have taken care of that. But I saw something else that looked better at the time: 17.m10, then if 18.n8 then 19.j7, and if 18.m7 then 19.p7 20.o7 21.n6. And once again, when I saw the 18.m7 response, I realized the fatal flaw in my reasoning: if 19.p7 then 20.q7 instead - an instant win for Lucy.
Crisis. I stared at it for some time before deciding to try something like 19.u9 20.t9 21.p7 22.q7 23.r6 24.o8 25.s8 26.r10 27.t11 28.s13 29.r12. But Black's response was 20.q11 instead. Good move.
I don't recall what my plan was with 21.s12. It was a last-ditch effort, anyway. After 22.t10, I was playing for a draw, but Lucy didn't let up.
or 14.j6 15.t11