Move sequences are automatically highlighted and made clickable. If the previous move number appears earlier in the comment, the sequence continues from that move. Otherwise, it's treated as a variation from the main line. This can be error-prone with multiple sequences in one comment, so please use the Preview button to check your work before posting.
To force a sequence to be treated as a main line variation, precede it with a vertical bar
(|). The copy variation button (⧉) includes this bar automatically.
For more complex discussions, you can name a sequence by adding the name in square
brackets at the end, e.g. 15.p9 [a]. Later in the same comment, or in
any following comment, you can branch off that variation by wrapping the name in vertical
bars, like this:|a| 16.o13
The variation name must start with
a letter, contain only letters, numbers, and dashes (-), and is case-sensitive.
Comments use UTF-8 encoding, so you can include emojis 😉, non-English characters, and other Unicode symbols.
You can also use HTML entities like — for an em-dash (—) or → for a right arrow (→).
For safety reasons, most HTML tags are stripped, except:
<b>, <i>, <u> — bold, italic, underline<em>, <strong> — emphasis, strong text<s>, <strike> — <sup>, <sub> — superscript, subscript<blockquote> — indented quotes
<code> — fixed-width font<pre> — multi-line preformatted text
<br> — forces a line break
|8.u21 9.r21 10.t19 11.p17 12.p21 13.n18 14.k21 15.m21 16.n20 17.l19 18.m22 19.i20 20.h22 21.f21 22.h18 23.g19 24.l6 which is silly and single minded play by both sides, which I attempt to redeem with the last move. My point is that u21 was a resource available to black as a "bust" to white's Medcalf.
Is not good
23.j20 24.j21 25.g19
I prefer:
|8.u21 9.r21 10.t19 11.p17 12.p21 13.n18 14.k21 15.m21 16.n20 17.l19 18.m22 19.i20 20.h22 21.f21 22.i19