Move sequences are automatically highlighted and made clickable. If the previous move number appears earlier in the comment, the sequence continues from that move. Otherwise, it's treated as a variation from the main line. This can be error-prone with multiple sequences in one comment, so please use the Preview button to check your work before posting.
To force a sequence to be treated as a main line variation, precede it with a vertical bar
(|). The copy variation button (⧉) includes this bar automatically.
For more complex discussions, you can name a sequence by adding the name in square
brackets at the end, e.g. 15.p9 [a]. Later in the same comment, or in
any following comment, you can branch off that variation by wrapping the name in vertical
bars, like this:|a| 16.o13
The variation name must start with
a letter, contain only letters, numbers, and dashes (-), and is case-sensitive.
Comments use UTF-8 encoding, so you can include emojis 😉, non-English characters, and other Unicode symbols.
You can also use HTML entities like — for an em-dash (—) or → for a right arrow (→).
For safety reasons, most HTML tags are stripped, except:
<b>, <i>, <u> — bold, italic, underline<em>, <strong> — emphasis, strong text<s>, <strike> — <sup>, <sub> — superscript, subscript<blockquote> — indented quotes
<code> — fixed-width font<pre> — multi-line preformatted text
<br> — forces a line break
1.u3 2.l17 3.p16 4.p19 This me setting a trap.
5.q18 This is my opponent walking into my trap,
There are two things you should do with every opening move.
1. Block my plans.
2. While you're doing that, try to generate new threats of your own.
White's Q18 does the first (locally) but not the second. Instead, |5.j17 looks much better.
Consider the game position after black O10. Do you see a way to stop this peg from connecting to the right wall? I sure don't. Do you see a way to block O10 from connecting to the left wall? I sure don't.
|7.r20 is not something I would have even thought of. It guarantees the connection to the bottom, but doesn't help connect to the top.
My first thought would be |7.s19, which still guarantees the connection to the bottom, but it helps the connection to the top. In this case, it actually catches the ladder chase from David's O10 peg: 8.o10 9.s10 10.r13 11.r12 12.p12 13.s14 14.s15 15.t16 16.t17 17.u18 - I hesitate to say it makes O10 flat out not work, but gives Black a tougher challenge.
Then I'd try to find something with an even lighter touch to the near border that helps the connection to the top more. Just rotating the link one unit, maybe |7.s17? 8.r20 9.v20 10.t20 11.t21 12.s22 13.u18 14.u23 15.w22 -- looks like it can connect to the bottom.
Then maybe consider disconnected pegs like |7.t17 - there is danger in leaving that gap, but White has its back against the wall and needs the strongest connection to the top that he can possibly muster. I don't actually like this one so much after 8.r18 9.v18 10.s16.
MC that's a good question. I was playing the opponent instead of the position, trying to tempt him into making another bad move, to make my job even easier. And it worked. Objectively I don't know which choice is better. After |6.o10 suppose white then plays 7.s19 This threatens white S10 as Alan showed. It would be too late for me to try 8.k19, instead I would probably extend upward from O10, maybe 8.o6 It still looks good for me, but I would have had to work harder in this unfamiliar position. The answer is, I was too lazy.