Move sequences are automatically highlighted and made clickable. If the previous move number appears earlier in the comment, the sequence continues from that move. Otherwise, it's treated as a variation from the main line. This can be error-prone with multiple sequences in one comment, so please use the Preview button to check your work before posting.
To force a sequence to be treated as a main line variation, precede it with a vertical bar
(|). The copy variation button (⧉) includes this bar automatically.
For more complex discussions, you can name a sequence by adding the name in square
brackets at the end, e.g. 15.p9 [a]. Later in the same comment, or in
any following comment, you can branch off that variation by wrapping the name in vertical
bars, like this:|a| 16.o13
The variation name must start with
a letter, contain only letters, numbers, and dashes (-), and is case-sensitive.
Comments use UTF-8 encoding, so you can include emojis 😉, non-English characters, and other Unicode symbols.
You can also use HTML entities like — for an em-dash (—) or → for a right arrow (→).
For safety reasons, most HTML tags are stripped, except:
<b>, <i>, <u> — bold, italic, underline<em>, <strong> — emphasis, strong text<s>, <strike> — <sup>, <sub> — superscript, subscript<blockquote> — indented quotes
<code> — fixed-width font<pre> — multi-line preformatted text
<br> — forces a line break
One continuation is |39.s13 40.q15 41.t15 42.t18 43.u17 44.u20 45.s18 46.r19 47.q19 48.p20 49.n22 50.n19 51.j20 52.m17 or 49.g20 50.g21 51.m19 52.n21 53.f16 54.c19
|33.n3 is an interesting variation which I discuss in the post https://boardgamegeek.com/thread/3533477/the-coign-ladder
White should have played |31.k12 and then 32.g5 would not work for black.
So, the first thing I'd think of is 29.p5. Anything wrong with that? Looks to me like that should win it for David. I mean the other David. White! I mean White.