Move sequences are automatically highlighted and made clickable. If the previous move number appears earlier in the comment, the sequence continues from that move. Otherwise, it's treated as a variation from the main line. This can be error-prone with multiple sequences in one comment, so please use the Preview button to check your work before posting.
To force a sequence to be treated as a main line variation, precede it with a vertical bar
(|). The copy variation button (⧉) includes this bar automatically.
For more complex discussions, you can name a sequence by adding the name in square
brackets at the end, e.g. 15.p9 [a]. Later in the same comment, or in
any following comment, you can branch off that variation by wrapping the name in vertical
bars, like this:|a| 16.o13
The variation name must start with
a letter, contain only letters, numbers, and dashes (-), and is case-sensitive.
Comments use UTF-8 encoding, so you can include emojis 😉, non-English characters, and other Unicode symbols.
You can also use HTML entities like — for an em-dash (—) or → for a right arrow (→).
For safety reasons, most HTML tags are stripped, except:
<b>, <i>, <u> — bold, italic, underline<em>, <strong> — emphasis, strong text<s>, <strike> — <sup>, <sub> — superscript, subscript<blockquote> — indented quotes
<code> — fixed-width font<pre> — multi-line preformatted text
<br> — forces a line break
Meanwhile, would somebody kindly explain to me why, after 4. I18 that 5. H17 doesn't work, since this would be my immediate reply.
(I said 'kindly')
Twixtbot plays |23.r19 out to a Black victory: 24.i12 25.m7 26.n8 27.k12 28.h10 29.n9 30.m6 31.e13 32.k13 33.l14 34.l15
Your line backs up what Alanbot said. 5. h17 IS effective - both blocking black from reaching the lower left AND guaranteeing that white reaches the bottom left. But you guys are saying that it doesn't matter - black erects a block in middle left and prevents white from connecting to top left.
OK then, 2 things: 1. Who says that black must proceed straight up from h17? Can there not be play through the middle of the board, aiming for upper right?
and 2. if KNOWING that 4. i18 can be bypassed, then was i18 kind of a feint ? Meaning, if white responds with h17 to punch through to the bottom, he wasted a move, where he should have played elsewhere?
I note that white DID play elsewhere, and black won by going straight across the bottom, including connecting the unblocked i18 to the left.
So maybe you can offer some insight on the reasoning behind a move like i18?