Move sequences are automatically highlighted and made clickable. If the previous move number appears earlier in the comment, the sequence continues from that move. Otherwise, it's treated as a variation from the main line. This can be error-prone with multiple sequences in one comment, so please use the Preview button to check your work before posting.
To force a sequence to be treated as a main line variation, precede it with a vertical bar
(|). The copy variation button (⧉) includes this bar automatically.
For more complex discussions, you can name a sequence by adding the name in square
brackets at the end, e.g. 15.p9 [a]. Later in the same comment, or in
any following comment, you can branch off that variation by wrapping the name in vertical
bars, like this:|a| 16.o13
The variation name must start with
a letter, contain only letters, numbers, and dashes (-), and is case-sensitive.
Comments use UTF-8 encoding, so you can include emojis 😉, non-English characters, and other Unicode symbols.
You can also use HTML entities like — for an em-dash (—) or → for a right arrow (→).
For safety reasons, most HTML tags are stripped, except:
<b>, <i>, <u> — bold, italic, underline<em>, <strong> — emphasis, strong text<s>, <strike> — <sup>, <sub> — superscript, subscript<blockquote> — indented quotes
<code> — fixed-width font<pre> — multi-line preformatted text
<br> — forces a line break
これで粘ってみるくらいかな?
17.t11 18.s11 19.s8 20.u12
17.s8 18.r8 19.v11 20.t7 21.v6 22.w6
局面は難しい。
|11.d16 12.e14 13.g14 14.g17 15.e18 16.f15 17.e15,
12.f15 13.c14 14.e18 15.c19 16.d19 17.d17 18.e17 19.d21 20.c16 21.b16,
12.g12 13.d11 14.f10 15.c9 16.e8 17.d6,
But 16.d7 17.d6 18.e5 19.c8 20.d3 21.e7 22.f7
Black probably wins this. 黒はおそらくこれに勝ちます。
😺
mc
|11.s15 12.r13 13.t12 14.s10 15.u9
is 16. v13 not a standard bust here? Maybe I am mistaken; probably the answer helps ME more than it helps yukiblue.
(meow)
mc
But I have since changed my mind about the left side. After 16.t9 white has a strong attack (defense) with
17.d16 18.g12 19.d11 20.f10 21.e8 22.f15 23.b15 or see my earlier analysis. But because black is stronger on the top right at this point, maybe 18.i7 threatening white F13 or maybe N9 would save the day. If we back up, 13.d16 looks much better for white.
|11.s15 12.r13 13.t12 14.s10 15.u9 16. v13
17. s14 18. r8 is NOT a line of play that would have occurred to me. Neither did your 'bust' with 17. s14. I DO believe that I have observed players get through a chain of 3-1 setups using a move like 16. v13 , but perhaps this does not work here. The type of play that occurs to ME might go:
|11.s15 12.r13 13.t12 14.s10 15.u9 16.v13 17.s14 18.u11 19.q13 20.p9 21.p10 22.o7 23.q8 24.q6
and black is doing OK, but these moves are made at my level of play, which will certainly have holes.
mc
If we pay attention to the right side of the board only, |11.s15 12.r13 13.t12 14.s10 15.u9 16.v13 17.s14 18.u11 and now 19.p10 is better than Q13. For example 20.q15 21.r11 22.s19 23.u18 24.v18 25.s17
But since 16.t9 wins locally for black, in this line white is advised to play on the left side of the board instead with D16, and sooner rather than later.