Move sequences are automatically highlighted and made clickable. If the previous move number appears earlier in the comment, the sequence continues from that move. Otherwise, it's treated as a variation from the main line. This can be error-prone with multiple sequences in one comment, so please use the Preview button to check your work before posting.
To force a sequence to be treated as a main line variation, precede it with a vertical bar
(|). The copy variation button (⧉) includes this bar automatically.
For more complex discussions, you can name a sequence by adding the name in square
brackets at the end, e.g. 15.p9 [a]. Later in the same comment, or in
any following comment, you can branch off that variation by wrapping the name in vertical
bars, like this:|a| 16.o13
The variation name must start with
a letter, contain only letters, numbers, and dashes (-), and is case-sensitive.
Comments use UTF-8 encoding, so you can include emojis 😉, non-English characters, and other Unicode symbols.
You can also use HTML entities like — for an em-dash (—) or → for a right arrow (→).
For safety reasons, most HTML tags are stripped, except:
<b>, <i>, <u> — bold, italic, underline<em>, <strong> — emphasis, strong text<s>, <strike> — <sup>, <sub> — superscript, subscript<blockquote> — indented quotes
<code> — fixed-width font<pre> — multi-line preformatted text
<br> — forces a line break
The 20.i14 21.g14 exchange seems to clearly favor white. Wouldn't 20.i12 be much better for black?
20.i12 21.k13 22.h15 23.g14 24.g13 25.f12 26.f10 is a black win
20.i12 21.j15 22.k13 likewise
Am I missing something?
With threat on o13 and m18 for white
20.i12 21.m14 22.l15 23.o13 24.t16 looks ok for black
20.i12 21.m14 22.l15 23.t15 24.p12 does too?
But 22.n12 23.k15 24.k14 25.k13 26.k18 27.i14 28.g18 looks winning for black.
So it looks like 22.l15 is the best answer to M14 and it leads to a draw.