Move sequences are automatically highlighted and made clickable. If the previous move number appears earlier in the comment, the sequence continues from that move. Otherwise, it's treated as a variation from the main line. This can be error-prone with multiple sequences in one comment, so please use the Preview button to check your work before posting.
To force a sequence to be treated as a main line variation, precede it with a vertical bar
(|). The copy variation button (⧉) includes this bar automatically.
For more complex discussions, you can name a sequence by adding the name in square
brackets at the end, e.g. 15.p9 [a]. Later in the same comment, or in
any following comment, you can branch off that variation by wrapping the name in vertical
bars, like this:|a| 16.o13
The variation name must start with
a letter, contain only letters, numbers, and dashes (-), and is case-sensitive.
Comments use UTF-8 encoding, so you can include emojis 😉, non-English characters, and other Unicode symbols.
You can also use HTML entities like — for an em-dash (—) or → for a right arrow (→).
For safety reasons, most HTML tags are stripped, except:
<b>, <i>, <u> — bold, italic, underline<em>, <strong> — emphasis, strong text<s>, <strike> — <sup>, <sub> — superscript, subscript<blockquote> — indented quotes
<code> — fixed-width font<pre> — multi-line preformatted text
<br> — forces a line break
|13.s19 14.s18 15.q18 16.o19 17.r21 18.q22 19.p20 20.p21 21.t17 22.s21 or
|13.s19 14.s18 15.p17 16.o19 17.r21 18.q22 19.t17 20.s21
So, I'm thinking "something else" would have been better, perhaps
|5.s17 6.q16 7.t15 8.r14 9.t13
When I see the board, this move is like the best way to lose.
Your position is probably good until there.
Of course after 9.q13 10.p16 it's horrible now.
You can see that you have an interesting threat in |9.n14, but I'm not sure if it is correct right now, for instance after |9.n14 10.n21 or around there it's maybe not good, need to be analyzed very precisely.
But you have another obvious very strong move in this position |9.h15
It gives you two different threats, h10 and somewhere in the middle to connect with p11, for instance the famous n14.
Moreover, black cannot answer |9.h15 10.h17 which is not working cause not connected to n17.
10.i12 11.n14 12.o15 13.l15 14.n13
or 13.l13 14.k16 15.f14 16.j6 17.j14 18.r7 19.q6 20.q9
or 11.m14 12.l16 13.f14 14.j6
or 13.j14 14.h20 15.h19 16.g18 17.j18 18.j15
or 13.j15 14.h19 15.k18 16.k16 17.k17 18.l18
Maybe your losing move was S7. Instead |7.m8 looks less vulnerable.
|9.h15 10.i12 11.n14 12.o15 13.l13 14.k16 15.f14 16.j6 17.j14 18.r7 19.q6 20.q9 21.m8 looks winning for white.
But how about 20.p8 21.r9 22.p12 23.r12 24.m19
|9.h15 10.i12 11.n14 12.o15 13.l13 14.k16 15.f14 16.j6 17.j14 18.r7 19.q6 20.p8 21.r9 22.p12 23.r12 24.m19 25.d13
It's over no?
|9.h15 10.i12 11.n14 12.o15 13.l13 14.k16 15.f14 16.j6 17.j14 18.r7 19.q6 20.p8 21.r9 22.p12 23.r12 24.m19 25.d13 26.o10 27.f8 28.g18 29.e18 30.f10 31.e10 32.b12
or 27.d8 28.g18 29.e18 30.b12 31.g17 32.d11 33.f10 34.f7 please what did I miss?
But 32.c13 looks better.
But of course, maybe there is just one complicated line which makes this still a win for black, so... maybe you're right.
|9.h15 10.i12 11.n14 12.o15 13.l13 14.k16 15.f14 16.j6 17.j14 18.r7 19.q6 20.p8 21.r9 22.p12 23.r12 24.m19 25.d13 26.o10 27.f8 28.e8 29.d7 30.g9 31.e9 32.g20 33.e20 34.b13
or 31.c9 32.g18 33.e18 34.b11