Move sequences are automatically highlighted and made clickable. If the previous move number appears earlier in the comment, the sequence continues from that move. Otherwise, it's treated as a variation from the main line. This can be error-prone with multiple sequences in one comment, so please use the Preview button to check your work before posting.
To force a sequence to be treated as a main line variation, precede it with a vertical bar
(|). The copy variation button (⧉) includes this bar automatically.
For more complex discussions, you can name a sequence by adding the name in square
brackets at the end, e.g. 15.p9 [a]. Later in the same comment, or in
any following comment, you can branch off that variation by wrapping the name in vertical
bars, like this:|a| 16.o13
The variation name must start with
a letter, contain only letters, numbers, and dashes (-), and is case-sensitive.
Comments use UTF-8 encoding, so you can include emojis 😉, non-English characters, and other Unicode symbols.
You can also use HTML entities like — for an em-dash (—) or → for a right arrow (→).
For safety reasons, most HTML tags are stripped, except:
<b>, <i>, <u> — bold, italic, underline<em>, <strong> — emphasis, strong text<s>, <strike> — <sup>, <sub> — superscript, subscript<blockquote> — indented quotes
<code> — fixed-width font<pre> — multi-line preformatted text
<br> — forces a line break
So I tried to hammer at |12.j11. It didn't help.
I wonder if something at the top would be better for 12? Or maybe 8 needed to be in the lower left somewhere?
|6.r15 7.r14 8.q17 9.t15 10.s21 11.q18 12.p20 13.s22
Your P11 was the right idea, block me on the top half, but maybe it was too close, and it doesn't coordinate with O18 very well. How about |6.n8 with the idea of Black R13 or maybe black R12 as a double threat to connect to either N8 or O18. For example
7.p8 8.r12 9.q11 10.r20 11.t20 12.v20 13.r19 14.q18 15.u22 16.r16 17.r15 18.q14
So instead, white should shift to the right side, maybe 7.i11 and at least now black looks in better shape to try an attack at the top right. 8.h7 maybe. But maybe black was already lost after O18. I certainly don't know, and I have seen stronger players than myself make opening moves similar to O18, but |4.o9 IMO looks better positionally because you are spreading your pegs across the board to make new threats instead of continuing a single battle.
Black R12 is (4,4) from black N8, and (3,6) from black O18. When you look at a move like R12 in the opening, are you taking these specific relationships into account, or are you just looking for something *around* that part of the board that might link up on the top or bottom?
What about the relationship between R12 and white S17 - is the fact that it's (6,1) away significant, or is it enough that it's in line to block that peg, or is its relationship there only coincidental to the broader black strategy? You also suggested R13 as a potential move, which is Achilles in relation to S17. Does that guide your selection?
I guess in other words, how granular is your thinking at this stage? Are you looking at the board in a big-picture way, just trying to identify which zone to play in, or are you also thinking tactically — and if the latter, what are you taking into consideration to make your tactical decisions?
6.n8 7.p8 8.o6 9.n9 10.m10 11.m11 12.q5 13.l9 14.k7
or 11.r7 12.r12
or 9.i11 10.h7