Move sequences are automatically highlighted and made clickable. If the previous move number appears earlier in the comment, the sequence continues from that move. Otherwise, it's treated as a variation from the main line. This can be error-prone with multiple sequences in one comment, so please use the Preview button to check your work before posting.
To force a sequence to be treated as a main line variation, precede it with a vertical bar
(|). The copy variation button (⧉) includes this bar automatically.
For more complex discussions, you can name a sequence by adding the name in square
brackets at the end, e.g. 15.p9 [a]. Later in the same comment, or in
any following comment, you can branch off that variation by wrapping the name in vertical
bars, like this:|a| 16.o13
The variation name must start with
a letter, contain only letters, numbers, and dashes (-), and is case-sensitive.
Comments use UTF-8 encoding, so you can include emojis 😉, non-English characters, and other Unicode symbols.
You can also use HTML entities like — for an em-dash (—) or → for a right arrow (→).
For safety reasons, most HTML tags are stripped, except:
<b>, <i>, <u> — bold, italic, underline<em>, <strong> — emphasis, strong text<s>, <strike> — <sup>, <sub> — superscript, subscript<blockquote> — indented quotes
<code> — fixed-width font<pre> — multi-line preformatted text
<br> — forces a line break
|15.e13 16.f11 did not look any better for white.
|11.f15 12.h16 13.g17 14.g13 also gives black plenty of room.
|7.e18 might have been better, but perhaps K20 was already winning for black.
R19 was strong, setting up for a sort of Medcalf defense with M19. So maybe my R16 was already losing?
|5.l13 was an artful move. What was the thinking behind that? I know, early moves can be hard to judge, especially against TwixtBot.
Its reply |6.k20 was surprisingly low - it serves as a catcher for your s18 threat, but looks so weak on the left... so maybe there was a better reply to that? What might have happened if, for example, |7.k18?