Move sequences are automatically highlighted and made clickable. If the previous move number appears earlier in the comment, the sequence continues from that move. Otherwise, it's treated as a variation from the main line. This can be error-prone with multiple sequences in one comment, so please use the Preview button to check your work before posting.
To force a sequence to be treated as a main line variation, precede it with a vertical bar
(|). The copy variation button (⧉) includes this bar automatically.
For more complex discussions, you can name a sequence by adding the name in square
brackets at the end, e.g. 15.p9 [a]. Later in the same comment, or in
any following comment, you can branch off that variation by wrapping the name in vertical
bars, like this:|a| 16.o13
The variation name must start with
a letter, contain only letters, numbers, and dashes (-), and is case-sensitive.
Comments use UTF-8 encoding, so you can include emojis 😉, non-English characters, and other Unicode symbols.
You can also use HTML entities like — for an em-dash (—) or → for a right arrow (→).
For safety reasons, most HTML tags are stripped, except:
<b>, <i>, <u> — bold, italic, underline<em>, <strong> — emphasis, strong text<s>, <strike> — <sup>, <sub> — superscript, subscript<blockquote> — indented quotes
<code> — fixed-width font<pre> — multi-line preformatted text
<br> — forces a line break
Would you have played 22.g13, I guess I may have played 23.j14 ? What's next I don't really know... Any suggestion ?
What happened after 28.h3 is also really interesting... we can also discuss that later on...
Seems winning for David.
After 22.g13 maybe 23.i12
For example 25.i12 26.g9 27.h9 28.i9 OR 25.g12 26.f15 27.i13 28.f19
If 23.i12 24.h11 25.h10 26.g9 and white does not stop L12 from connecting to the N16 group.
Regarding 28.h3, if anyone sees an improvement for black I would very much like to see it.
Anyway 23.g13 seems to be a strong move for back. I'll try to think about it and post a comment would I find something...
In my opinion 28.h3 was not a bad move. After that move I knew I would not be able to connect the top from the left side but at the same time I was in a bad position in the center because you would play n4 somehow. I thus needed an extra peg in this area to support my run for a connection in the center. I could get it by "forcing" your moves on the left and getting the j5 peg that would have been so important would you have played n4.
I wonder if 32.e4 would not had been a stronger move for black ?
So how about |22.g13 23.j16 24.g5 25.l13 26.k14 27.k15 28.o8 29.k9 30.n6 (instead of m7) 31.g3 32.j6 33.f5 34.g9 35.d9 36.f11