Move sequences are automatically highlighted and made clickable. If the previous move number appears earlier in the comment, the sequence continues from that move. Otherwise, it's treated as a variation from the main line. This can be error-prone with multiple sequences in one comment, so please use the Preview button to check your work before posting.
To force a sequence to be treated as a main line variation, precede it with a vertical bar
(|). The copy variation button (⧉) includes this bar automatically.
For more complex discussions, you can name a sequence by adding the name in square
brackets at the end, e.g. 15.p9 [a]. Later in the same comment, or in
any following comment, you can branch off that variation by wrapping the name in vertical
bars, like this:|a| 16.o13
The variation name must start with
a letter, contain only letters, numbers, and dashes (-), and is case-sensitive.
Comments use UTF-8 encoding, so you can include emojis 😉, non-English characters, and other Unicode symbols.
You can also use HTML entities like — for an em-dash (—) or → for a right arrow (→).
For safety reasons, most HTML tags are stripped, except:
<b>, <i>, <u> — bold, italic, underline<em>, <strong> — emphasis, strong text<s>, <strike> — <sup>, <sub> — superscript, subscript<blockquote> — indented quotes
<code> — fixed-width font<pre> — multi-line preformatted text
<br> — forces a line break
Instead of 17.h14, |17.g12 would have been more forcing and would have been prettier: 18.h12 19.h14 20.g10 21.j15 and now 22.o9 would have been the same as the game line, or 22.k15 23.r19 24.s8 25.u7 26.r11 27.u12 28.t5 29.t4 30.s3 31.v5
spd_iv played 20.o9 because of |20.k15 21.r19 22.s18 23.p18 24.p21 25.n17 and he resigned because of |34.l20 35.n9 36.f21 37.f22 38.e23 39.g20 40.g22 41.h22 or |34.h20 35.p20
my 17.h14 was careless, but maybe not a losing move after all: |18.o9 19.m7 seems to work. 20.g13 21.j15 22.n7 23.k13 24.l8 25.h8 26.i10 27.j11, or |18.o9 19.m7 20.h12 21.j15 22.n7 23.k13 24.l8 25.i8
Any ideas?
I changed my mind about |18.o9 19.m7 because of 20.n7 but instead, how about |18.o9 19.k13
|22.l6 23.i6 24.i9 25.h8 26.k10
|22.l6 23.i6 24.i9 25.m8
|20.k15 21.r19 22.s18 23.p18 24.p21 25.n17 26.n16 27.m19 28.s10 29.r11 30.r8 31.u8 32.u5 33.p10 34.o8 35.n9 36.m9
|20.k15 21.r19 22.s18 23.p18 24.p21 25.n17 26.n16 27.m19 28.s10 29.r11 30.r8 31.u8 32.u5 33.p10 34.o8 35.p9