Move sequences are automatically highlighted and made clickable. If the previous move number appears earlier in the comment, the sequence continues from that move. Otherwise, it's treated as a variation from the main line. This can be error-prone with multiple sequences in one comment, so please use the Preview button to check your work before posting.
To force a sequence to be treated as a main line variation, precede it with a vertical bar
(|). The copy variation button (⧉) includes this bar automatically.
For more complex discussions, you can name a sequence by adding the name in square
brackets at the end, e.g. 15.p9 [a]. Later in the same comment, or in
any following comment, you can branch off that variation by wrapping the name in vertical
bars, like this:|a| 16.o13
The variation name must start with
a letter, contain only letters, numbers, and dashes (-), and is case-sensitive.
Comments use UTF-8 encoding, so you can include emojis 😉, non-English characters, and other Unicode symbols.
You can also use HTML entities like — for an em-dash (—) or → for a right arrow (→).
For safety reasons, most HTML tags are stripped, except:
<b>, <i>, <u> — bold, italic, underline<em>, <strong> — emphasis, strong text<s>, <strike> — <sup>, <sub> — superscript, subscript<blockquote> — indented quotes
<code> — fixed-width font<pre> — multi-line preformatted text
<br> — forces a line break
I was very surprised by this move and I had to accept that I lost the game there.
Was well played, I will work more (-;
37.o8 38.m5 or
37.n6 38.n4 39.o8 40.l5 or
37.n4 38.p4 39.o8 40.l5 or
37.o4 38.p4 39.o8 40.m5
all looking good for Black. Of course, still a lot of tactics left. I was in the hope that Florian can give an easy answer to 34. t6 that shows the ultimate advantage for White he mentioned.
|34.t6 35.s8 36.o6 37.o8 38.m5 39.m9
And then, Maciej is threating j6.
30.q7 31.p9 32.q9 33.s9 34.r5 35.t7 36.s3?
|40.l5 41.i5 42.j6 43.l9 44.g5 45.g4 46.h7 47.f6