Move sequences are automatically highlighted and made clickable. If the previous move number appears earlier in the comment, the sequence continues from that move. Otherwise, it's treated as a variation from the main line. This can be error-prone with multiple sequences in one comment, so please use the Preview button to check your work before posting.
To force a sequence to be treated as a main line variation, precede it with a vertical bar
(|). The copy variation button (⧉) includes this bar automatically.
For more complex discussions, you can name a sequence by adding the name in square
brackets at the end, e.g. 15.p9 [a]. Later in the same comment, or in
any following comment, you can branch off that variation by wrapping the name in vertical
bars, like this:|a| 16.o13
The variation name must start with
a letter, contain only letters, numbers, and dashes (-), and is case-sensitive.
Comments use UTF-8 encoding, so you can include emojis 😉, non-English characters, and other Unicode symbols.
You can also use HTML entities like — for an em-dash (—) or → for a right arrow (→).
For safety reasons, most HTML tags are stripped, except:
<b>, <i>, <u> — bold, italic, underline<em>, <strong> — emphasis, strong text<s>, <strike> — <sup>, <sub> — superscript, subscript<blockquote> — indented quotes
<code> — fixed-width font<pre> — multi-line preformatted text
<br> — forces a line break
I don't think it would have changed the outcome, however.
If Maciej plays 23.o12 anyway, then I was thinking of:
24.r7 25.r9 26.p7 27.s5 28.q5 29.s7 30.u4 31.u6 32.s4 33.u2
Later, I thought of:
24.p4 25.s5 26.r5 27.u6 28.s8 29.r9 30.q7 31.t8. I was kind of relieved that didn't work, since I'd already missed my chance.
In the bigger picture, Maciej has a strong j10 threat on the left side, and would probably abandon the upper right battle pretty quickly to play that.