Move sequences are automatically highlighted and made clickable. If the previous move number appears earlier in the comment, the sequence continues from that move. Otherwise, it's treated as a variation from the main line. This can be error-prone with multiple sequences in one comment, so please use the Preview button to check your work before posting.
To force a sequence to be treated as a main line variation, precede it with a vertical bar
(|). The copy variation button (⧉) includes this bar automatically.
For more complex discussions, you can name a sequence by adding the name in square
brackets at the end, e.g. 15.p9 [a]. Later in the same comment, or in
any following comment, you can branch off that variation by wrapping the name in vertical
bars, like this:|a| 16.o13
The variation name must start with
a letter, contain only letters, numbers, and dashes (-), and is case-sensitive.
Comments use UTF-8 encoding, so you can include emojis 😉, non-English characters, and other Unicode symbols.
You can also use HTML entities like — for an em-dash (—) or → for a right arrow (→).
For safety reasons, most HTML tags are stripped, except:
<b>, <i>, <u> — bold, italic, underline<em>, <strong> — emphasis, strong text<s>, <strike> — <sup>, <sub> — superscript, subscript<blockquote> — indented quotes
<code> — fixed-width font<pre> — multi-line preformatted text
<br> — forces a line break
Let's say the game had gone |33.e7 34.g16 instead. Did white have a winning option? I couldn't find one.
And, if white could beat black's |33.e7, does black have an alternative?
Let's say the game had gone |33.e7 34.g16 instead. What's a winning move for white? I couldn't find one.
If there is one, then is the an option for black with move #34, or has white secured the win with the block at the top?
Let's say the game had gone |33.e7 34.g16 instead. What's a winning move for white? I couldn't find one.
If there is one, then is there another option for black with move #34, or has white secured the win with the block at the top?
|33.e7 34.g16 35.g17 36.h18 37.h19 38.e17 39.j15 40.j16 41.i17 or
if 40.j17 41.k17 42.k19 43.l19 or
if 38.i20 39.e16 40.g19 41.e20 or
if 36.e17 37.i16
It looks like I tossed the game on my last move. I don't see anything better for you in this line than G16.
|33.e7 34.g16 35.g17 36.i17
White's options to that scenario?
|33.e7 34.g16 35.g15 and now
if 36.i17 37.f17 38.f21 39.f22 or
if 36.f18 37.i15 38.h16 39.g14 or
if 36.j16 37.g19 38.h19 39.e18
SO how about
|33.e7 34.g16 35.d20 36.f18 37.c18 38.d16 39.d17 40.b17 41.f19 or
if 36.e17 37.i16 38.j16 39.h18 or
if 36.i17 37.d16
|33.e7 34.g16 35.d20 36.e18 37.g17 38.i15 39.e16 40.g19 41.d18 or
if 38.g19 39.i17 40.h15 41.e16 42.c17 43.i16 or
if 38.i17 39.e16 40.g19 41.d18
?
36.e15 37.i16 38.j16 39.g17
Though, I confess I didn't anticipate this sequence. I had planned for...
|33.e7 34.g16 35.e18 36.e20
...which I now see as flawed.
|33.e7 34.g16 35.e18 36.f18 37.g19 38.d17 39.i16 40.j16 41.h17 42.i17
Maybe my losing move was 17.T12. Just |17.e7 before you play J20 looks like a win. I tripped myself up with all that stuff on the right side.
I didn't keep any notes on what my contingency plan was had you played 17.e7 (or something similar) at that point, but I had anticipated it. One of the better analyst can probably say, but it does feel to me like that that was where an advantage shift took place. I played too slowly and had long gaps in play to really have an integrated strategy. I had to refresh my situational awareness each time I came back to the game up until the end game.
I never felt secure about that lower left hand corner, which is why I was delighted (obviously) to have you focused on stitching that up and forgetting about the upper left.
I'm not proud. I'll take it.