I see said the blind man as he picked up his hammer and saw.
On 2013-12-05 at 03:48, dushoff said:
:-). I was confused by Talos's post, because in my mind the whole point of 32.t8 (instead of the linking move 32.t7) is to threaten v7.
On 2013-12-05 at 03:49, dushoff said:
Didn't mean to post that either, and now I know how I post by accident: by hitting space instead of alt. In any case, of course I meant "the linking move 32.s7")
On 2013-12-05 at 03:55, dushoff said:
Very confusing. I swear it said "Dushoff said", and an early draft of a post that I wrote. Now it's gone, and only the correction remains.
Here is what I meant to say:
:-). I was confused by Talos's post because, to my mind, the only reason to play 32.t8 (as Talos suggests) instead of 32.s7 (the naive linking move) would be because t8 threatens v7.
31.s11 32.t8 33.v4 34.v8 35.w8
or
31.s11 32.x7 33.w8 34.w5 35.t5
white wins?
Here is what I meant to say:
:-). I was confused by Talos's post because, to my mind, the only reason to play 32.t8 (as Talos suggests) instead of 32.s7 (the naive linking move) would be because t8 threatens v7.