Move sequences are automatically highlighted and made clickable. If the previous move number appears earlier in the comment, the sequence continues from that move. Otherwise, it's treated as a variation from the main line. This can be error-prone with multiple sequences in one comment, so please use the Preview button to check your work before posting.
To force a sequence to be treated as a main line variation, precede it with a vertical bar
(|). The copy variation button (⧉) includes this bar automatically.
For more complex discussions, you can name a sequence by adding the name in square
brackets at the end, e.g. 15.p9 [a]. Later in the same comment, or in
any following comment, you can branch off that variation by wrapping the name in vertical
bars, like this:|a| 16.o13
The variation name must start with
a letter, contain only letters, numbers, and dashes (-), and is case-sensitive.
Comments use UTF-8 encoding, so you can include emojis 😉, non-English characters, and other Unicode symbols.
You can also use HTML entities like — for an em-dash (—) or → for a right arrow (→).
For safety reasons, most HTML tags are stripped, except:
<b>, <i>, <u> — bold, italic, underline<em>, <strong> — emphasis, strong text<s>, <strike> — <sup>, <sub> — superscript, subscript<blockquote> — indented quotes
<code> — fixed-width font<pre> — multi-line preformatted text
<br> — forces a line break
|30.t12 31.v15 32.u15
|30.t12 31.w14 32.v11 33.t16 34.s15 35.s17 36.s19 37.s20 38.r21 39.p22 40.s23
The final position is tricky:
|32.s15 33.w14 34.s11 35.t11 36.r9 37.r12 38.q12 39.p13 40.o13 41.n14 42.m14 and Black wins
|32.s15 33.w14 34.s11 35.t12 36.u10 and Black wins
|32.s15 33.w14 34.s11 35.u10 36.u8 37.v8 38.t10 39.t12 40.t13 41.t11 should work for White, also
|32.s15 33.w14 34.s11 35.u10 36.u8 37.v8 38.t10 39.t11 40.s12 41.t12
27.u18 28.s16 29.s13 30.r14 31.u12 32.s12 33.s11
26.v18 27.w18 28.u14 29.s18 30.s17 31.t16 32.t15
Well, I'm tired. I cannot remember which is the variation to prevent the 20.t17 attack against the Achille... :-(
There should be one isn't it ?
However, it seems that both |21.v17 and |21.s19 come to the same : |21.v17 22.s21 23.v21 24.s17
Btw, I cannot see the difference with a "standard" Achille such as |8.o19 9.o17 10.m18 11.q18 12.q20 13.u19
When you say "both |21.v17 and |21.s19 come to the same", I think you miss that the link on s17 could be important. For example, |21.v17 22.s21 23.v21 24.s17 and then 25.r16.
|27.u18 28.w21
I was comparing
|21.s19 22.s21 23.v21 24.t19 25.v17 26.s17, then 27.u15
and
|21.v17 22.s21 23.v21 24.s17. if 25.r16 then 26.t19 27.u15
I agree that the later is better for white.
@Mirko : Sorry for my stupid comment...