Move sequences are automatically highlighted and made clickable. If the previous move number appears earlier in the comment, the sequence continues from that move. Otherwise, it's treated as a variation from the main line. This can be error-prone with multiple sequences in one comment, so please use the Preview button to check your work before posting.
To force a sequence to be treated as a main line variation, precede it with a vertical bar
(|). The copy variation button (⧉) includes this bar automatically.
For more complex discussions, you can name a sequence by adding the name in square
brackets at the end, e.g. 15.p9 [a]. Later in the same comment, or in
any following comment, you can branch off that variation by wrapping the name in vertical
bars, like this:|a| 16.o13
The variation name must start with
a letter, contain only letters, numbers, and dashes (-), and is case-sensitive.
Comments use UTF-8 encoding, so you can include emojis 😉, non-English characters, and other Unicode symbols.
You can also use HTML entities like — for an em-dash (—) or → for a right arrow (→).
For safety reasons, most HTML tags are stripped, except:
<b>, <i>, <u> — bold, italic, underline<em>, <strong> — emphasis, strong text<s>, <strike> — <sup>, <sub> — superscript, subscript<blockquote> — indented quotes
<code> — fixed-width font<pre> — multi-line preformatted text
<br> — forces a line break
What I understand is that Klaus played 19.o13 because
if |19.r6, then 20.p6 21.t5 22.v7 23.s8 24.s13 25.t12 26.t11
if |19.u7, then 20.s4 21.v5 22.u3
But I don't understand why Maciej played |20.p6. Why not |20.m13 ?
If |20.m13 then 21.r6 22.p6 23.t5 24.v7 25.s8 26.s13, and then 27.n16. In other words, as soon as the |19.o13 peg went in, the r15-q17 group could be disconnected from either the left edge or the right edge in one move. The only connection to the right edge, then, was across the top, and the lightest touch that could possibly protect that path was 20.p6.