Move sequences are automatically highlighted and made clickable. If the previous move number appears earlier in the comment, the sequence continues from that move. Otherwise, it's treated as a variation from the main line. This can be error-prone with multiple sequences in one comment, so please use the Preview button to check your work before posting.
To force a sequence to be treated as a main line variation, precede it with a vertical bar
(|). The copy variation button (⧉) includes this bar automatically.
For more complex discussions, you can name a sequence by adding the name in square
brackets at the end, e.g. 15.p9 [a]. Later in the same comment, or in
any following comment, you can branch off that variation by wrapping the name in vertical
bars, like this:|a| 16.o13
The variation name must start with
a letter, contain only letters, numbers, and dashes (-), and is case-sensitive.
Comments use UTF-8 encoding, so you can include emojis 😉, non-English characters, and other Unicode symbols.
You can also use HTML entities like — for an em-dash (—) or → for a right arrow (→).
For safety reasons, most HTML tags are stripped, except:
<b>, <i>, <u> — bold, italic, underline<em>, <strong> — emphasis, strong text<s>, <strike> — <sup>, <sub> — superscript, subscript<blockquote> — indented quotes
<code> — fixed-width font<pre> — multi-line preformatted text
<br> — forces a line break
So, recognizing the Y threat, the stem looks unassailable (I see no way to connect L19 to the left edge), the branches are too high for a threat over the top, and the middle looks fine, too (|23.e13 24.i12 25.l14 or |23.e13 24.k12 25.f7).
I don't see a win for Black if |23.e13. In the bigger picture, there were not enough Son points at stake to change the outcome of the Championship.
The most interesting aspect of this game to me is what a nice move 24.m13 seems to be. I was thinking of 23.e13 at the time, but it never occurred to me that I would lose the chance if I played t16 first.
Thanks as always, Alan.