Early on, I thought that maybe I could win, but I was still inexperienced. 22.h16 is a very beautiful move. At 37.q14 I was sure I was going to win, but I didn't think it was going to end like this. White should have used 41.u20.
On
2022-02-13 at 10:13,
ptolemycasio
said:
I didn't understand the intent of 14.l10 at the time, but I have to say that I get it when I see how it develops later. I learned a lot and appreciate it.
On
2022-02-13 at 14:24,
Peyrol
said:
Yes, |41.v22 also would have worked for white I believe. T18 and Q14 were both excellent.
I should have played |26.o21. Then I could have answered 27.t18 with 28.t21. I got lazy on the right side after winning on the left.
It is interesting how the same patterns can occur more than once in the same game. O21 corresponds to H6, and T23 is like G23. But T23 does not work, as you pointed out. So maybe I am just fooling myself, but when a specific tactical pattern appears in a well-played game, it often appears twice in the same game, or so it seems to me.
22.h16 is a very beautiful move.
At 37.q14 I was sure I was going to win, but I didn't think it was going to end like this.
White should have used 41.u20.
I learned a lot and appreciate it.
I should have played |26.o21. Then I could have answered 27.t18 with 28.t21. I got lazy on the right side after winning on the left.
It is interesting how the same patterns can occur more than once in the same game. O21 corresponds to H6, and T23 is like G23. But T23 does not work, as you pointed out. So maybe I am just fooling myself, but when a specific tactical pattern appears in a well-played game, it often appears twice in the same game, or so it seems to me.